Filed in archive
Government
by Marc on April 28, 2006

From the article:
Keep in mind that criminal copyright infringement is no longer limited to situations involving commercial piracy. Thanks to laws like the No Electronic Theft (NET) Act and the Family Entertainment and Copyright Act (FECA), the feds can now bring criminal charges against people for simply uploading a single "pre-release" song (as two Ryan Adams fans discovered last month when they were brought up on federal charges for uploading tracks from pre-release promotional CDs).
Most of the changes sought by DoJ fall into two broad categories: (1) making it easier to convict people of criminal copyright infringement by eliminating the inconvenient necessity of proving that actual infringement took place; and (2) increasing the financial and penal penalties when someone is convicted.
This guarantees one result: more innocent people will be convicted. After all, if you're wrongly accused, but you know the feds don't have to prove their case and you're facing serious jail time, you're more likely to accept a plea bargain.
In fact, DoJ will have an easier time convicting you of criminal charges than civil litigants will have suing you for money. This is exactly backwards. Before they throw people in jail for copyright infringement (especially where the infringement does not involve a commercial motive), the feds should have to prove their case, just like copyright owners in civil cases. They should have to prove, among other things, that infringement took place, that it took place within the applicable statute of limitations, and that the work was properly registered.
Is it too much to ask that DoJ actually do its homework and prove its case before it imprisons people and seizes their assets for uploading a Ryan Adams song?
Permalink: The U.S. Department of Justice wants YOU
Tags:
DOJ
legislation
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/21193
Mr Wong
Vote for The U.S. Department of Justice wants YOU:
|
Rating: 6.00 out of 3 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Alcohol Rehab
(05/20/07 10:22pm)
The Department of Justice is pushing for legislation that would expand the scope of, and stiffen the penalties for, criminal copyright infringement. The legislation has not yet been introduced, but the relevant subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee has quietly circulated a draft bill based on the DoJ wish list.
Response from:
Addiction Treatment
(05/25/07 4:34am)
It dramatically increases the maximum prison sentences applicable to most criminal copyright provisions, including the anti-camcording laws enacted just last year.
Response from:
Narconon
(06/02/07 4:11pm)
It dramatically increases the maximum prison sentences applicable to most criminal copyright provisions, including the anti-camcording laws enacted just last year.
Response from:
Canadian Drug
(06/29/07 8:29am)
Well, the web isn't like the good old times. There are some issues here I want to talk about. When it comes to a copyright crime I think it shouldn't be a conviction without some charges from the owners. There is no crime without a victim and the state is not the victim in this case.
Response from:
Prilosec
(07/04/07 9:27am)
Well, the web isn't like the good old times. There are some issues here I want to talk about. When it comes to a copyright crime I think it shouldn't be a conviction without some charges from the owners. There is no crime without a victim and the state is not the victim in this case.
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |










