Filed in archive
Education
, Technology
by Marc on June 19, 2007

A few niche services for hifi aficionados have developed like MusicGiants, which digitizes files in a lossless format that results in 25MB files, up to 10 times the size of typical MP3 files. But such services have seen limited adoption.
It turns out 128 KB/s is simply "good enough." Higher bit rates don't deliver a proportional increase in sound quality. Furthermore, the increase in fidelity is typically undetectable unless a user's full system (headphones, PC speaker, car speakers, portable music player, etc.) is high-end and tuned for such files.
Permalink: How Important is Bit Rate?
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/73921
Mr Wong
Vote for How Important is Bit Rate?:
|
Rating: 7.00 out of 2 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Shea P.
(06/05/07 8:28am)
You said it, higher bit rate doesn't matter unless you have a quality system to enjoy the music on. That said, if you've ever listened to a 128 kbps music file with premium AV gear, it's garbage. There's an audience for uncompressed downloadable music so MusicGiants will stick around.
Response from:
Ariel Monzon
(05/05/08 12:26pm)
There is a reason that music professional pay up to 3.00 for a download at 320kbps. It's not because we want to fill our harddrives with large songs files, it's because with a highly responsive playback system, the difference can be heard. lower compression and higher quality with added warmth to the songs is the reason why it's better to get music at a higher bitrate.
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |










