Filed in archive
International
by Marc on January 27, 2006

What is chilling is that the Court was not interested in hearing about direct evidence and issued summary judgement without allowing a trial. That is different from the US where a few cases are going to trial.
From the article:
"His defence, that the BPI had no direct evidence of infringement, was rejected by the High Court and summary judgment was granted to the BPI without the need for a trial. He has been ordered to make an immediate payment of £5,000. Total costs are estimated at £13,500 and damages are expected to take the bill even higher."
"The father of two, a postman from Brighton, sought to defend the case against him on the grounds that he was unaware that what he was doing was illegal and did not seek to gain financially."
"His [defendant's] case was also thrown out of court, with Judge Justice Lawrence Collins declaring, "Ignorance is not a defence." The defendant was ordered to make an immediate payment of £1,500, pending final determination of costs and damages."
Permalink: File Sharing is illegal in the UK
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/14590
Mr Wong
Vote for File Sharing is illegal in the UK:
|
Rating: 8.00 out of 4 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
Julian Bond
(01/28/06 3:46am)
Response from:
Marc Freedman
(01/29/06 9:19pm)
Julian,
The charge was copyright infringement. Whatever passed for evidence, likely IP address and metadata, was not published. I am disturbed as well. However I have no knowledge of British law and so can't comment more.
Marc
The charge was copyright infringement. Whatever passed for evidence, likely IP address and metadata, was not published. I am disturbed as well. However I have no knowledge of British law and so can't comment more.
Marc
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |











There's something deeply wrong here. So what exactly did the BPI provide in the way of evidence and argument? And what was the guy actually charged with?